venturing away from progressive principles when she starts agreeing with areyouready/prison break/leaf.

it's fine to have her own opinion and use her blog to promote hillary and bash obama and edwards but she doesn't acknowledge it.

she should take a note from her candidate and just learn to admit she's rooting for hillary and not try to have it both ways

Sorry to hear this. I knew Taylor Marsh wasn't a deep thinker, and was in the tank for Hillary while pretending not to be, but I thought that she--unlike, say, Batt Sowers of Openleft--allowed dissent.

It's your gain, DFL; you'll be a little smarter not having to go over there.

I didn't know she was a blogger.

I saw her on MSNBC last week and figured she was some radio person.

Yeah, she said criticizing Hillary is the same as criticizing the Democratic party.

Funny, actually, since many people consider Hillary a Democrat In Name Only.

I realized how disingenuous and downright nefarious she was last week when after a week of condemning John Edwards for what she perceived as a 'bubba strategy' in making his case for electability in contrast to Senator Clinton, she posted a video of Joe Scarborough arguing that Senator Obama can not win because "Reagan Democrats will not vote for an African American."  Rather than condemning Joe Scarborough for pandering to racist fears, she used this video to validate her opposition to Senator Obama's candidacy, which often borders on the irrational.  It's clear that she has a hyper-sensitivity and zero tolerance to even the perception of sexism but complete tolerance and acceptance of racism when it furthers her cause: getting Hillary Clinton elected.

I just revisited her site this morning and she deleted drfranklives comments he posted last night, and she told me that I was attacking her personally because she must have hit a nerve when disparaging John by implying he's using code when appealing to rural America on his electability.  She stated in one of her posts that rural Americans would never vote for a black person or a woman.  Yep, her words.  Oh and she stands by her analysis.  I'm expecting to be banned any minute, because I'm pretty sure she doesn't like it when she's exposed for who she really is.

you mean "carries water for"

Look, it's simple, you guys feel sh has a right to the nomination.

Edwards feels the people have the right to vote.

"Fair" meaning "stuck up her butt".

You're right...Chris Matthews would NEVER stoop to arguing that Senator Obama is unelectable because of his race as she did last week when she posted a video of Joe Scarborough making that argument.

Prisonbreak/areyouready likes her.

she;s a prominent Hillary blogger, and I caught her being dishonest in a post, and she banned me for it.

That's worth discussing.  I would discuss it on her site, but, oops, she banned me.

you certainly don't have to comment on it.

I agree 100%.  These "I've been banned" diaries that want to "discuss" WHY these people are being banned on sites like Dkos, openleft, Huffpost or Taylor Marsh are ridiculous.   Usually the people who have these diaries act like trolls, so they get canned.  Big whoop.  We are supposed to discuss that HERE?   How incredibly self-absorbed.

The only way I can see this make for good discussion fodder is if one of us goes on Freerepublic or Redstate to "concern-troll," eventually gets trounced and then reports about it here.   This cheap attack stuff on a poster who has frontpage privileges on this site (crescendoing at the end into what amounts to slander) is tasteless.

You guys are outrageous.  Now you're gunning for Taylor?  

These Edwards supporters who are attacking Taylor are despicable.

Just stop it.  It's going too far.

Didn't you burn Atlanta to the ground?

and then note that the one taken down was the one that called her on her BS.

Funny.. when I first looked at this dark gif I thought I was looking at George Bush. No kidding.

Again, who has the blog? Who communicates regularly with the campaigns for comments? Who has the internet radio show? Who actually makes a living at this? You? NO, Taylor Marsh

Yes, I felt really bad for her

especially msnbc is not only a coward  - but also a fool..

notice which campaigns are now buds with matthews and russert?

did ya notice how they treated gore in 2000 and promoted bush?

do you have any clue?

right?...

just like your boy trippi...

I guess we should forget how he trashed Gore in 2000 huh....oh that was long ago...and since he hates Hillary...he's gotta be good...right?

chris matthews copyrighted that rant!

give it back!

Victimhood may work for Hillary in the Democratic Primaries, but it will kill her in the General.

to blog this.

I haven't heard this anywhere but pretty amazing that Pelosi says this

Yeah, I know Nancy's not very popular in the blogosphere, but I think she's got class.

half very wrong..

first off...."charchter' in politics is GOP code for...lets defeat democrats.../

second - our PARTYS PRIMARY PROCESS ISNT SET UP TO amuse OR entertain OR EVEN EDUCATE you...its to pick a candidate and to prepare to run in the election and to win the White House.

You had it right that we are fearful that Obama and edwards are acting just like bradley - and risking giving ammo to our foes just like Bradley did in 2000 when HE - not the GOP introduced the word LIAR into that election....

Remember how that ended up?

And who goaded Bradley into FIGHTING BACK with gore? ....Lets see....Russert aand Matthews...

You have this so almost right....please go visit my friend the dailyhowlers site - and read up about these clowns in the media....you know the new scripters for both the edwards and obama campaigns...

expect GOP people to hand out Lewinsky cigars

The problem with that is that it is ALL about Hillary now.  I believe she'll win this nomination hands down, but what if not?  Say, Obama wins it, or even Edwards.  We will know everything there is to know about Hillary, the frontrunner, but we will not have done nearly as thorough a job (only scratched the surface) of vetting the other candidates.  That is the danger here, and that is why that last debate was such a joke.  I would have appreciated some questions about Edwards' inconsistencies (i.e. flown around via jet by known lobbyist at a rate of $850)  or Obama's (not a word about the McClurkin issue?  Shameful for "hard-hitting" Russert.)    If everything should be on the table, then ALL of it.  This 100% focus on Clinton does not serve us well, unless she wins it easily.  If she stumbles we are cheating ourselves out of "all card of the deck on the table" with any of our other candidates with the current track we are on.

First of all, thank you for the civil tone of your comment.  It's much appreciated.  However, it is simply not true that Clinton supporters (like me) think it's all over except for the voting - we are all acutely aware that anything can happen.  However, many of us do believe that Dems should engage other Dems in a less confrontational way that the techniques that Edwards is using.

I don;t have any p[problem with the candidates slapping each other around a little, but they should decide to use a mace like Edwards.  I think his attacks are way over the top, and they don;t seem to be doing him any good.  No matter who the nominee is, I think that a rancorous primary from Dems hurts the party in the GE, and it just isn't worth it.

It is possible to articulate the differences between you and the next guy without kicking him in the stomach.  I'm not sure Edwards understands that.

Ridiculous.  She has had some very critical pieces aimed at Hillary Clinton, as recently as last week.  Please get your facts straight.   Why is everybody who agrees with your viewpoint (speaking to the larger Edwards-community here) bought and paid for by Clinton, a Clinton stooge, etc.   Seems very simple minded to go that route.  

don't worry, u're not missing anything from ms. marsh. it's all junk when it comes to presidential race.

I see your point, and these types of diaries need to be kept to a minimum, but this one serves a purpose of exposing the bigot and hack that is Taylor Marsh.  

.... all along. About a year ago, I produced a series of "hit diaries," summarizing the shortcomings of all the Democrats. I just figured, why not get it all out up front? If I can find the dirt on the internet, the Repugs can too. So why not get it all out beforehand. People here thought I was crazy, and bashed the hell out of me. Crazy like a fox!